Eva Feder Kittay Distinguished Professor of Philosophy Stony Brook University NY USA Quality of Life Quantity of Skills Sesha David Hinsberg DO BE DO Why I am not qualified to speak about ID: 431723
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Problems, Prospects and Possibilities: T..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Problems, Prospects and Possibilities: The Quality of Life Of and With A Persons With Severe Cognitive Disabilities.
Eva
Feder
Kittay
Distinguished Professor of Philosophy
Stony Brook University, NY USASlide2
Quality of Life = Quantity of Skills*
/
Sesha
*David
Hinsberg
. DO? BE? DO?Slide3
Why I am not qualified to speak about
autism
Sesha has no difficult or disruptive behaviors
Sesha loves physical contact and physical affection
Not sure: Is autism itself ever an intellectual disability?Slide4
Why I may be
There is much I do not know or understand about my daughter’s cognitive abilities, including intellection.
Cognitive disability is broader than “intelligence” and includes various sources of learning disability
There appears to be a common bond between parents and their children regardless of the form of cognitive disability
DEALING WITH THE NON-NORMAL
LOVEJOYSlide5
Love, joy and the gift of just being able to beSlide6
Other points of contact
process
their world and experiences
atypically;
experience
a range of human possibilities only
partially
available to
or not salient for others
;
have
a greater degree of dependence on the
care
challenge the model of the human as fully functioning, rational, independent and productiveexperience a rich joy in being, even though life is not always joyful and sometimes painful and frightening.
Individuals whoSlide7
PROBLEMS
It’s not easy being normalSlide8
“Having a child with a severe disability makes every parent into a philosopher
.”
What if the parent is already a philosopher?
You become a
humbler philosopherSlide9
The philosopher’s norm
the
ability to be autonomous and
to act rationally and
reasonablyThese are presumed to be at core of their conception of “moral personhood.” Slide10
“The unexamined life is not worth living”
But
there was no question in my mind that
Sesha’s life
was worth living.Slide11
Some sadnesses
that come with a child with severe cognitive disability
She is so vulnerable. Can she be safe?
She will not be able
to form a family or have an intellectual life or
a work of her own Slide12
PROSPECTS
The problem with normal and the prospects for normalizationSlide13
“The paradox is they identify is
that a child who doesn’t fit in has to be seen as somehow impaired in order to justify an effort to
normalise
him
”Roy Richard Grinker,
Isabel’s World, p.318.Slide14
The “Normalization Movement”
A move away from the medical model
Bringing the lives of the cognitively impaired into line with what is thought of as a normal life
Including people with cognitive disabilities in the lives and activities of the nondisabled
Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The principle of Normalization in human services
. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.Slide15
Two senses of normal
1.
An
objective “judgment of reality” (e.g. a statistical frequency)
; 2. a subjective “judgment of value.” . Canguilhem, Georges.
The Normal and the Pathological. Translated by Carolyn Fawcett. New York: Zone Books, 1991.Slide16
As a “judgement
of value”
The normal ≈ the desirable ≈ the
good
The nonnormal
≈ the undesirable ≈ the pathological Slide17
As a “judgment of reality”
Why should the statistical norm be desired?Slide18
Two senses of normal
1
.
“Judgment
of reality” The normal as what is statistically frequent 2.
“Judgment of value.” The normal as what we value.
Pathology
Variation
AnomalySlide19
“A human trait would not be normal because frequent but frequent because normal, that is, normative in one given kind of life”
(
Canguilhem
1991, 160)Slide20
Two examples of the value-ladenness
of “judgments of reality”
The case of the
normal
lifespanThe case of the prevalence of deafness on Martha’s Vinegard
in the late 19th and early 20th centurySlide21
[
A]t
all times, as long as there have been human beings, there have been human herds and very many who obeyed compared with very few who were in command; [obedience] was the trait best and longest exercised and cultivated among men. [
I]t has become an innate need.”
Fredrick NietzscheSlide22
“The herd instinct”—a need to obey, to follow commands, to acquiesce to authority.
Fredrick NietzscheSlide23
We need not stifling norms but capacious onesSlide24
“What normality was for her”
“Knowing Isabel, our perception of that abstract concept ‘quality of life’ has changed and become more fluid. In our conversations with nurses and doctors they frequently pointed out that we, the nurses and
carers
who knew her well, were the specialists in Isabel’s case and that we knew
what normality was for her.”
Sabine VanackerSlide25
Values like language requires what Wittgenstein called “stagesetting
,
” and presumes a
community who share practices and purposes. Slide26
We build on the old normal to create a new normalSlide27
POSSIBILITIES
From
“the new normal” to the good life
Slide28
JoySlide29
The paradox of normal
We all want to be normal
No one wants to be loved because they are normal
Everyone wants to be loved because of what is distinctiveSlide30
The Valentine’s Card from Hell
You are so normal
Please be my valentineSlide31
The Paradox Dissolves:
We see the special when the normal is in the
backgound
You are so normal
Please be my valentine
There is no one like youSlide32
Walter Michel, Personal Discussion
“Sesha has such good survival skills. She knows how to make people love her and that is the most important survival skill of all.”Slide33
“Joy is a man’s passage from a lesser to a greater perfection.”
Spinoza,
The Ethics
(
Definition II. Bk III). Slide34
Do? Be? Do? Dave Hinsberg’s
Lists
To Do List
Item
item
To Be ListItemItemItemItemItem
itemSlide35
Love, joy and the gift of just being able to beSlide36
We should judge the value of a life not just what is can accomplish, but the what it brings into the lives
of
others
Richard Roy
Grinker, Isabel’s World