Risk-taking in academic libraries: the implications of Prospect Theory - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Risk-taking in academic libraries: the implications of Prospect Theory

Tony Horava, AUL (Collections)

University of Ottawa

OLA

SuperConference

Jan. 28, 2015Slide2

Organizational riskProspect Theory Major principles

Implications for risk assessment

Implications for academic librariesConclusion

Outline

http://cache2.asset-cache.net/gp/108113005.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=3&d=awaM4LoT7hBkpnWMaZOi86ZN5uTph2KW34WXjDY%2fRL2UfTKpg7wZzBTEKgLqfqxS

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQy--5w9ScJN3T7GUeALRugf6pBpyBJE9MmTQa6EpB0EZz1qYh4Slide3

“Society values risk taking but not gambling, and what is meant by gambling is risk taking that turns out badly. From the point of view of managers and a society dedicated to good management, the problem is to develop and maintain managerial reputations for taking "good" (i.e., ultimately successful) risks and avoiding "bad" (i.e., ultimately unsuccessful) risks, in the face of (possibly inherent) uncertainties about which are which.”

James G. March and

Zur Shapira

, “Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking,” Management Science 33, no. 11 (1987): 1413. Organizational riskSlide4

The ARL 2030

Scenarios

: A sustained reflection upon the

risks and opportunities for libraries, based on four possible scenarios. It is up to each library to assess the probability of any scenario occurring

“Organizations act on what they know or what they believe they know to be certain. Many of those certainties are in actuality uncertainties. Those false certainties become the basis for an organization’s strategic decision-making. “Scenario planning: assessing riskSlide5

Frames - lenses that filter some things and allow others to pass through, help us order experience.

Each frame comes with concepts and metaphors for organizing our understanding of the world,

esp organizational culture

Four frames – Structural; Human resource; Political; SymbolicLooking at organizations this way can help us assess what is working and what isn’t – and addressing risk in reframing

Bolman and Deal’s Four Frame model (“Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership”)Slide6
Slide7

Technological -

rapid obsolescence and the hype cycle;

inadequate or dysfunctional

tools; lack of interoperability with other systems;

foreshortened life cycles for development; the quality of maintenance and supportFinancial -

the institution’s degree of support of the library;the foreign exchange rate;

Ontario’s and Canada’s economic performance; investments made by the institution; the global economy & inflationDimensions of organizational risk: some exampleshttp://wilderdom.com/images/RiskNotTakingRisksCartoon.jpgSlide8

Political -

institutional strategic agendas shifting in direction;

changes in senior administration and therefore shifting loyalties and power balances;

a range of stakeholders in the academy with different/complementary interests;

Assessment standards and measurement of impacts;unpredictable directions/pressures for post-secondary education; new governments with new agendasSocio-cultural –

new patron attitudes and preferences in their use of information and devices;new learning styles based on use of social media and new technologies; new purposes for using library spaces and collections, such as collaborative work

shifting demographics that can lead to a new mix of the student population; Organizational risk (cont’d)Slide9

Mental

paradigms

affect risk assessment and decision-making in libraries. The historian of science Thomas Kuhn asserted that a paradigm is "the entire constellation of beliefs, values, techniques, and so on shared by the members of a given community

.”

- In a library context, this constellation is typically conservative, reactive, and risk-averse (but changing…)The importance of process: "The less things are predictable the more attention you have to pay to the strategy process. Uncertainty has the effect of moving the key to success from "the optimal strategy" to the "most skilful strategy process.” Kees van

van der Heijden, Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation vii-viii.

Paradigms and processSlide10

“Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk” Econometrica

1979 47(2):

263-291. http://www.princeton.edu/~

kahneman/docs/Publications/prospect_theory.pdf The authors Daniel

Kahneman and Amos Tversky, awarded the Nobel Prize for Economics in 2002Originally applied to behavioral economics; then applied to other contextsHas led to a more nuanced understanding of how we grapple with uncertainty and make decisions in the face of risk.Prospect TheorySlide11

Probability weighting

Reference

dependence; Loss

aversion; Diminishing sensitivity;

Prospect Theory – basic principlesSlide12

The role of probability weighting in decision-making is quite crucial. Typically, “the weighting function

overweights

low probabilities and underweight high probabilities.” Generally speaking, people are overconfident about expected outcomes related to risk, and make decisions with particular biases

Interview with Daniel Kahneman:

“People systematically violate the predictions of expected utility theory.”“The emotional tail wags the rational dog”Probability weightingSlide13

People derive utility from gains and losses, measured relative to some reference point, rather than from any absolute standard for economic well-being.

All gains and losses are therefore relative; no one size fits all

Think of your Collections budget, or Operations budget, or staff complement, as the reference point for your library’s experience in any given year – versus previous years.

Reference dependenceSlide14

Loss aversion - people are much more sensitive to losses—even small losses—than to gains of the same magnitude,

eg

“people tend to be risk averse over moderate probability gains: they typically prefer a certain gain of $500 to a 50 percent chance of winning $1,000.” People hate losing much more than they love winning (by a factor of about 2-3 to 1, based on

Kahneman and Tversky’s research)

Loss aversionSlide15

Replacing a $100 gain (or loss) with a $200 gain (or loss) has a significant utility impact, replacing a $1,000 gain (or loss) with a $1,100 gain (or loss) has a smaller impact.

As numbers scale upward – think of budgets or collections- this implies that we become less sensitive to the impact that variations from expectations can produce

A serial that costs

$100 this year and jumps to $500 next year is seen as a dramatic increase, versus a serial that costs $5,000 this year and $5,400 next year.

Scale of perception is different.- Diminishing sensitivitySlide16

Kahneman

and

Tversky asked subjects to choose between the following two options:

A) a 5% chance to win a three-week trip to England, France and Italy; or

B) a 10% chance to win a one week trip to England. 67% of participants chose Option A, and 33% chose B, even though the odds are in favour of B.

Choices people make…Slide17

In a second test, subjects were asked to choose between the following two options:

A) a 20% chance to win a gamble for $4,000; or B) a 25% chance to win a gamble for $3,000

Result: 65% of participants chose Option A, and only 35% chose B, even though the odds are in

favour of B.More choices…Slide18

Collection strategies, eg

the possible end of the Big Deal

Funding challenges/existential threatsThe galloping horse of technology Transformation of services

Contingencies such as natural disastersCollaborative projectsStaffing shortfalls

Etc....In thinking about… Slide19

Can these principles be useful in our mental toolkit for decision-making, ie

in a climate where

increasingly difficult choices will need to be made (coming to terms with losses or tradeoffs

)Prospect Theory can make

us more aware of our default ways of understanding risk It speaks to the importance of making decisions using evidence-based approaches, both for short and long term planningImplications for risk assessmentSlide20

Risk is baked in to the academic world, and increasing in intensity with each year

The more aware we are of risk dynamics, the better equipped we are with dealing with tough constraints and choices.

Reviewing the full spectrum of high and low risk

events & factors, in relation to our understanding of probability and contingency, is valuable.Prospect Theory can provide us with some insights on human decision-making under risk. Can this transfer to our world and be useful?

“Risk-taking in Academic Libraries: The Implications of Prospect Theory” Library Leadership & Management 28(2) 2014.https://journals.tdl.org/llm/index.php/llm/article/view/7055

http://itsadeliverything.com/wordpress/images//assumption-means-risk.png

ConclusionSlide21

Tony Horava

thorava@uottawa.ca

(613) 562-5800 ext

3645

Thanks very much! Any questions/comments?