/
Classification   of  mental Classification   of  mental

Classification of mental - PowerPoint Presentation

singh
singh . @singh
Follow
364 views
Uploaded On 2022-06-11

Classification of mental - PPT Presentation

disorders Istvan Bitter 17 October 2016 Purpose of Diagnosis in Psychiatry Order and Structure Communication Predict Outcome Decide Appropriate Treatment Research Assist in the search for pathophysiology and etiology ID: 916689

mental dsm research disorders dsm mental disorders research diagnosis rdoc information diagnostic health nimh http history classification psychiatric criteria

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Classification of mental" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Classification of mental disorders

Istvan

Bitter

17

October

, 2016

Slide2

Purpose of Diagnosis in PsychiatryOrder and Structure

Communication

Predict Outcome

Decide Appropriate Treatment

Research:

Assist

in the search for pathophysiology and etiology

Slide3

Procedural considerations for AssessmentClassification and diagnosis usually follow clinical interviewing to determine diagnosis

A

diagnostic

interview

is t

he

most widely used assessment tool in clinical psych

iatry

.

Slide4

Assessments

Psychological

:

Clinical

interviews and

reports

Tests

(

psychological

incl

.

neuropsychological

)

Biological:

Scanning

brain function

(

e.g

.

CT,

CT,

MRI

,

f

MRI

, EEG,

PET)

Neurochemical

Genetic

Psychohysiological

measures

Slide5

Components of Psychiatric AssessmentIdentifying dataChief Complaint

History of Present Illness

Past Psychiatric History

Past Medical

History

Family

History

Social History

Mental Status Exam

Assessment

: Main

diagnosis

and

comorbidities

(

psychiatric

and

somatic

)

Slide6

Mental status examination incl

.

General appearance

Consciousness

Orientation

Speech and thought

(

speed

,

content

)

Perception MoodAnxietyAttention/concentration MemoryInsight and judgement Intelligence/higher intellectual functioningSuicidality

Slide7

General Appearance and BehaviorDescribe appearance/behaviorGrooming, hygiene, facial expressionsJewelry, tattoos,Attitude towards examiner

Does

pt

look stated

age

?

Slide8

Psychomotor ActivityPosture

Describe motor activity

Does s/he

s

eat

quietly

or

agitated

?

Note abnormal movements

Tics EPS (extrapyramidal symptoms)mannerisms catatoniaTD (tardive dyskinesia)

Slide9

SpeechNote patient’s speechRRR (regular in rate and rhythm)Pressured, slow, normal

Loud, soft

Poverty of speech/content of speech

Latent

Echolalia

Aphasia

Slide10

Thought FormDescribe thought process—this is inferred by pattern of speechSlow vs.

fast

Logical

and goal directed

Concrete

Preservative

Circumstantial, tangential

Thought

blocking

Slide11

Thought ContentDescribe Content of ThoughtDelusions

Ideas of Reference

Obsessions and Compulsions

Phobia

Distorted body image

Poverty of content

Passive

death

wish

Suicidal/Self Harm/Homicidal Ideation

Slide12

MoodMood is an emotional attitude that is relatively sustained (based on patient’s report)Euthymic

Depressed

Hyperthymic

(English: euphoric – however „

phoria

” is not a

e

qu

i

valent to „

thymia

” . Which is mood!)Irritable (mixed states – suicidality!)

Slide13

AffectAffect refers to way pt conveys her/his emotional state (

based

on

observation

)

Appropriate vs inappropriate

Full

blunted

flat

Slide14

Sensorium and Cognition 1.Mini Mental Status Exam covers most of the

components

Describe level of alertness

Orientation

(

time

,

space

,

self

and others) Memory Very short term: repeat 3 itemsShort term: recall 3 itemsLong term: events that occurred in past

Slide15

Sensorium and Cognitive Function 2.

General Information

List 5 past presidents, current events

Calculations

Serial 7’s vs

3’s

,

spell

WORLD

backwards

Capacity to Read and Write

Read text, write a sentenceVisuospatial AbilityCopy designProverbs

Slide16

Insight and JudgmentInsight: does the patient understand her/his illness, t

he

need for treatment?

Judgment: does the person make good choices?

Slide17

PANSS: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale

Copyright

protected

Slide18

PANSS: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale

http://egret.psychol.cam.ac.uk/medicine

/

scales

/PANSS

Slide19

The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)

Permission is hereby granted to reproduce this

material for not-for-profit educational purposes only, provided

The Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, Division of Nursing, New York University

is cited as the source.

Available on the internet at www.hartfordign.org. E-mail notification of usage to: hartford.ign@nyu.edu.

Slide20

MMSE (2)Copy the design shown.

_____

Total Score

ASSESS level of consciousness along a continuum ____________

Alert Drowsy Stupor Coma

Slide21

Clock test Please draw a clock which shows quarter to 3.

Slide22

Diagnostic Manuals Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

,

(5th

Edition

2013

)

DSM-5,

American Psychiatric Association

International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death (10th version - 1993)

– ICD-10, World Health Organization

Slide23

History of DSM

DSM I (1952)

established mainly by psychoanalysts to distinguish groups of psychoneurotic disorders, such as anxiety.

Interpretations of psychoneurotic disorders were mainstream Freudian

(

defense

mechanisms

).

Discourses of ‘reactions’ predominated.

Slide24

DSM II (1968)1950’s - 1960’s - psychoanalysis still dominated. Psychoneurotic problems became defined as ‘neurotic’ disturbances (e.g. hysteria)

In 1973, homosexuality was removed, replaced by ‘sexual orientation disturbance’

There was little in the way of clear descriptions of ‘disorders’. All ‘symptoms’ were defined as ‘symbolic’ (of unconscious processes)

Slide25

DSM III (1980)Completely new directions in psychiatry - instead of symptoms defined as ‘symbols’ - they were viewed as natural disease categories

Return to the world of medicine

Aims: research driven; operational criteria; based on ‘symptoms’ check list, not symbolic gestures

Outcome: the production of a science driven document – ego-dystonic homosexuality still included

Translated into

many

languages

Slide26

ICD – 11 in 2018?http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd11/browse/f/en

Slide27

http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd11/browse/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f405565289

BNO – 11

Slide28

http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd11/browse/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f405565289

BNO – 11

Slide29

DSM-III Paradigm Shift

Descriptive

Non-etiologic focus

Diagnostic criteria

Multiaxial system

Multiple

diagnoses

(

increase

in

comorbidities)

Reliability

Slide30

DSM III R (1987)+ self-defeating personality disordersPost-traumatic stress disorder was introduced to account for repeated trauma in Vietnam veteransPressure groups altered the course of the DSM – ego-dystonic homosexuality removed

Slide31

DSM IV (1994)Neurosis as a term is no longer in existenceMental

disorders included

DSM II = 85 disorders

DSM III = 265 disorders

DSM

III

-R

= 292 disorders

DSM IV = 297 disorders

Slide32

DSM-IV TR, 2000Minor changes

Slide33

DSM-IV: Multi-Axial Classification System

Axis

I lists the majority of mental disorders.

Axis II is reserved for persistent or chronic conditions

(

e.g

.

personality

disorders

)

The separation was intended to assure that more chronic conditions are not overlooked.Axis III is designed to present general medical information

Slide34

DSM-IV: Multi-Axial Classification SystemAxis IV is designed to present specific information about the client’s current psychosocial environment.A number of global categories of problems are suggested in the DSM text.

Practitioners are encouraged to include specific information on Axis IV in addition to such global characterizations.

Slide35

Multi-Axial Classification SystemGlobal Assessment Functioning (GAF) score is listed on Axis V.This 100-point scale is presented in

DSM

-IV

.

In some situations, an individual’s functioning can be at very different levels depending on which aspect is emphasized.

It is recommended that in those instances, the client’s potential for danger to self or others should take precedence in determining the GAF score.

Slide36

Global

Assessment

of

Functioning

Scale

GAF – DSM IV

Copyright

protected

Slide37

Slide38

DSM-5, 2013Controversies about both the process of creating DSM-5 and about its content as well.Two out of the major challengers:1.

Thomas

Insel

,

Director

of

the

National Institute of Mental Health

2. Allan Frances, Chair of the DSM-IV Task Force of the American Psychiatric Association

Slide39

Reseach Domain Criteria (RDoC)Thomas

Insel

,

Former

d

irector

of

NIMH

*

http://www.behavioral.net/sites/behavioral.net/files/imagecache/570x360/RDoC2.PNG

*

This year Thomas Insel announced

his

decision

to

move

to

Google

Slide40

NIH: RDOC and APA : DSM-5May 13, 2013 • Press Release

http://www.nimh.nih.gov/news/science-news/2013/dsm-5-and-rdoc-shared-interests.shtml

Thomas R.

Insel

, M.D., Director, NIMH

Jeffrey A. Lieberman, M.D., President-elect, APA

NIMH and APA have a shared interest in ensuring that patients and health providers have the best available tools and information today to identify and treat mental health issues, while we continue to invest in improving and advancing mental disorder diagnostics for the future.

Today, the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), along with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) represents the best information currently available for clinical diagnosis of mental disorders. Patients, families, and insurers can be confident that effective treatments are available and that the DSM is the key resource for delivering the best available care. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) has not changed its position on DSM-5. As NIMH's

Research Domain Criteria (

RDoC

) project website states, "The diagnostic categories represented in the DSM-IV and the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10, containing virtually identical disorder codes) remain the contemporary consensus standard for how mental disorders are diagnosed and treated."Yet, what may be realistically feasible today for practitioners is no longer sufficient for researchers. Looking forward, laying the groundwork for a future diagnostic system that more directly reflects modern brain science will require openness to rethinking traditional categories. It is increasingly evident that mental illness will be best understood as disorders of brain structure and function that implicate specific domains of cognition, emotion, and behavior. This is the focus of the NIMH’s Research Domain Criteria (

RDoC) project. RDoC is an attempt to create a new kind of taxonomy for mental disorders by bringing the power of modern research approaches in genetics, neuroscience, and behavioral science to the problem of mental illness.

The evolution of diagnosis does not mean that mental disorders are any less real and serious than other illnesses. Indeed, the science of diagnosis has been evolving throughout medicine. For example, subtypes of cancers once defined by where they occurred in the body are now classified on the basis of their underlying genetic and molecular causes.All medical disciplines advance through research progress in characterizing diseases and disorders. DSM-5 and RDoC represent complementary, not competing, frameworks for this goal. DSM-5, which will be released May 18, reflects the scientific progress seen since the manual's last edition was published in 1994.

RDoC

is a new, comprehensive effort to redefine the research agenda for mental illness. As research findings begin to emerge from the

RDoC

effort, these findings may be incorporated into future DSM revisions and clinical practice guidelines. But this is a long-term undertaking. It will take years to fulfill the promise that this research effort represents for transforming the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders.

By continuing to work together, our two organizations are committed to improving outcomes for people with some of the most disabling disorders in all of medicine.

###

About the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH):

The mission of the NIMH is to transform the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses through basic and clinical research, paving the way for prevention, recovery and cure. For more information, visit the

NIMH website

.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH)

: NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit the

NIH website 

.

Slide41

Too Loose criteria?

Slide42

Parts of a psychiatric disorder definition

1.

Symptoms

2

.

Time

– onset (e.g. ADHD: before age 12)

and/

or

length (e.g. major depressive episode: min 2 weeks)

3. Significant distress and/or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of functioning. 4. Exclusion criteria (substance or an other medical condition)

Slide43

Reliability and ValidityReliability

Consistent diagnoses

Interrater

reliability

Clear methods of assessment, standardised symptoms

Validity

Construct validity

Etiological Validity: Consistent Causal Factors

Predictive

Validity: Successful prognosis - most people with bi-polar respond well to lithium carbonate, suggesting coherence in diagnostic group

Slide44

DSM and ICDAdvantages

Improve reliability of dx

Clarify dx and

facilitate history

taking

Clarify and facilitate process of differential diagnosis

Disadvantages

False sense of certainty

May sacrifice

validity

for reliability

RELIABILITY: capacity of individuals to agreeVALIDITY: capacity to make useful predictions

Treat dx like checklist and forget about patient as a person