/
USHC 3.4 Summarize the end of Reconstruction, including the role of anti–African American USHC 3.4 Summarize the end of Reconstruction, including the role of anti–African American

USHC 3.4 Summarize the end of Reconstruction, including the role of anti–African American - PowerPoint Presentation

tatyana-admore
tatyana-admore . @tatyana-admore
Follow
364 views
Uploaded On 2018-10-24

USHC 3.4 Summarize the end of Reconstruction, including the role of anti–African American - PPT Presentation

Reconstruction in the South 18671877 Carpetbag Carpetbaggers Nickname applied by Southern whites to people who migrated South after the Civil War The Carpetbagger Stereotype Carpetbaggers ID: 695557

south reconstruction freedmen jim reconstruction south jim freedmen carpetbaggers

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "USHC 3.4 Summarize the end of Reconstruc..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

USHC 3.4Summarize the end of Reconstruction, including the role of anti–African American factions and competing national interests in undermining support for Reconstruction; the impact of the removal of federal protection for freedmen; and the impact of Jim Crow laws and voter restrictions on African American rights in the post-Reconstruction era.

Reconstruction

in the South

1867-1877Slide2

CarpetbagSlide3

“Carpetbaggers”Nickname applied by Southern whites to people who migrated South after the Civil WarSlide4

The “Carpetbagger”StereotypeSlide5

“Carpetbaggers”Individual carpetbaggers’ goals were diverse:PowerOpportunityWealthServiceSlide6

Educating Freedmen and WomenAlthough many carpetbaggers went South to seek fortune and political office, many went South to educate freedmen and women.Hampton Institute (VA)Late Nineteenth CenturySlide7

The Republican Coalitionin the South“Carpetbaggers”“Scalawags”FreedmenSlide8

Resistance to ReconstructionSlide9

The (First) Ku Klux KlanGen. Nathan Bedford Forrest, CSAVigilantism 1865-1874Slide10

Restoration of Southern “Home Rule”1869-18771869187418711877

1877

18771874

1873

1870

1869

1876Slide11

1874Northern public opinion turns against Radical Reconstruction.Perception of “Colored Rule” and corruption in the South under Carpetbag state governmentshttp://blackhistory.harpweek.com/7illustrations/reconstruction/coloredrule.htm Slide12

1874 Congressional ElectionsU.S. House of RepresentativesVOTERS REACT TO:Bad EconomyPolitical CorruptionReconstruction PolicySlide13

Election of 1876Republican PlatformDemocratic Platform

Tilden: 184

Hayes: 166Disputed: 19FTW: 185

1872

1868

1876Slide14

http://elections.harpweek.com/controversy.htm Slide15

Compromise of 1877DISPUTED ELECTION

Samuel Tilden

(D-NY)

Rutherford B. Hayes

(R-OH)

Rutherfraud

184

166

185Slide16

“Redeemer” GovernmentsSouthern White “Bourbon” Democrats re-assert authority“Solid South”DEMOCRATIC STRONGHOLDRepublican Party a non-entity in Southern politics until the 1960sGov. Wade Hampton (SC)Slide17

The “Solid South”Almost 50 Years LaterSlide18

Jim Crow“Jim Crow” LawsRacial SegregationGrandfather ClauseLiteracy TestsPoll TaxDesigned to keep Black citizens from voting

Segregation

and Voting RestrictionsSlide19

The Supreme Courtand Civil Rights(Late Nineteenth Century) In the late 19th

century, the Supreme Court upheld Jim Crow, as well as restrictions on voting (since these restrictions did not explicitly discriminate based on race).Slide20

Plessy v. FergusonLouisiana Racial Segregation Case“Separate But Equal”Overturned by Brown v. Board (1954)14(1896)Slide21

LEARNING. DELIVERED.