Lesson 22 ENQUIRY QUESTION 3 How successful is the management of tectonic hazards and disasters HW TASK 4 Read the information Hodder page 90 in this booklet about two recent tectonic mega disasters ID: 756744
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "TOPIC 1:TECTONIC PROCESSES AND HAZARDS" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
TOPIC 1:TECTONIC PROCESSES AND HAZARDS
(Lesson 22)Slide2
ENQUIRY QUESTION 3:
How successful is the
management of tectonic hazards and disasters?Slide3
H/W :TASK 4
Read the information
(Hodder page 90 in this booklet) about two recent tectonic mega disasters : 1) 2010 Eyafjallajokull
Icelandic eruption and
2) 2011
Japanease
Tokoku
Earthquake/ tsunami.
Compare and contrast the economic and human impacts which occurred as a result of each event. ( 8 marks)Tips:Compare – what are the similarities?Contrast – what are the differences?DON’T talk all about one event then the other- compare and contrast facts from each event as you go…Slide4
COMMENTS FROM MARKING HOMEWORK
1. The focus of this response was that both events were
MEGADISASTERS but hardly anyone referred to them as such!2. People who did the best were the ones who
separated human(social) and economic impacts into two separate paragraphs
. ‘The human / economic impacts were….’ They then continued to compare and contrast points about the Icelandic volcano and Japanese tsunami within individual paragraphs .
IT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO WRITE ALL ABOUT ONE EXAMPLE THEN ALL ABOUT THE OTHER WITH JUST THE WORD ‘WHEREAS’ IN BETWEEN!
3. Both Japan and Iceland are
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES!!!
4. The better answers included
key terms e.g. In Japan the fact that most of the victims were 60 yrs + meant that they were an extremely vulnerable sector of society who were least resilient whereas the relatively isolated location of the Icelandic volcano meant that population density was
low and risk also low.
5. It was good to see some people using comparisons between the
LARGE AREAL EXTENT of both tectonic events. Using key terms will ALWAYS IMPRESS EXAMINERS!6. Be careful not to ‘assume’ knowledge e.g. you needed to say that it was the ash cloud which interfered with the planes engines which then led to flight cancellations etc..Slide5
Last lesson’s objectives
To understand what a hazard hotspot /multiple hazard zone is
To analyse the global distribution of multiple hazards on mapsTo look at the Philippines as an exampleTo compare the Philippines with California , USASlide6
CASE STUDY- PHILIPPINES MULTIPLE HAZARD ZONESlide7
HAND IN/CHECK TASKS- Complete the following…
1.
Read ‘Multiple hazard zones’ section on the Philippines .Answer the following questions in the ‘Over to you’ section :2, 3, 4, 5
2. Read the information on table 3.5 p.34 ‘Comparing the Philippines and California – classic multiple – hazard geography and
make your own summary notes.
3. Read Geo Fact File ‘Hazard Hot spots and the human response’.
Answer as many of the focus questions at the end as you can :
ALL OF YOU should be able to do questions 1, and 2a)
MOST OF YOU should be able to do questions 2b) 2c) and 3a)
SOME OF YOU should be able to do question 3b Slide8
Today’s lesson objectives part 1 :
To know the difference between
predicting and forecasting hazard events What prediction methods are
currently in place?Slide9
Today’s Specification content
1.8
Theoretical frameworks can be used to understand the prediction, impact and management of tectonic hazardsa)
Prediction and forecasting
(‘Players’: role of scientists) accuracy depend on the type and location of the tectonic hazard.Slide10
WHITEBOARD PAIRED THINKING
Write down as many different ways as you can think of as to how governments and scientists can
PREDICT tectonic hazards.
What is the difference between
PREDICTING
and
FORECASTING
tectonic hazards?Slide11
See booklet p.47-51
Seismic records
Radon gas emissions Ground water
PREDICTING TECTONIC HAZARDS
Remote sensing
Strange animal behaviour
increase in seismic activity..Slide12
The difference between prediction and forecasting?
Predicting
tectonic hazards means trying to accurately work out WHEN AND WHERE earthquakes or volcanoes are likely to happen.
Forecasting
tectonic hazards, however, is based on a
STATISTICAL LIKELIHOOD
of a tectonic event happening at a particular location.Slide13
Can earthquakes be prevented?Slide14
Earthquake Prevention?
This is
almost impossible
as they occur with very little warning
10,000 tremors a year but
only 20-50 cause real damage
There have been
attempts
to lubricate plate movement to prevent sticking and the build up of energy which precipitates a quake e.g. with water and oil but to no avail!Slide15
Can earthquakes be predicted?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-38323832
(Recent BBC news item on earth surfacewarping Dec 15th 2016)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-38349755
( new phone app to record earthquakes takes off- Dec 17 2016)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFB-qpiKccs
( can earthquakes be predicted?)Slide16
predict
plan
protect
predict
water levels can rise in wells and lakes because of cracks in the rock
foreshocks before the main quake can be detected by a seismometer
animals can act strangely before the earthquake
a tiltmeter can check any movement within the rocks
How can we limit earthquake damage?Slide17
Earthquake Prediction
Currently
NO RELIABLE WAY
to accurately predict when an earthquake will occur, though scientists can indicate where they are
LIKELY TO OCCUR
.
Methods to try to detect an imminent earthquake include:
Seismic records
Radon gas emissions
Ground water Remote sensingGround surveyingStrange animal behaviourSlide18
TASK 1:
Complete information sheets on Earthquake management:
Prediction (p.48-49)Slide19
Task 2: Earthquake risk can be forecast…
Read then make notes from Hodder p.93 in bookletSlide20
Task 3: The current science behind earthquake prediction…
Read then make notes from Hodder p.93 in bookletSlide21
Soufriere Hills volcano, Montserrat
VOLCANO MANAGEMENTSlide22
Why manage volcanoes?
500 MILL people live in their shadows…
Between 50-70 erupt on land EVERY YEAR…
Many deaths occur as a result of volcanic hazards(
estimated 26,000 deaths between 1980-1990)
Human activities are adversely affected
e.g
crops destroyed, Cattle die from inhaling ash, engines ruined from ash, cars affected….Slide23
Managing volcanoes….Slide24
CAN VOLCANOES BE PREDICTED?Slide25
Mt St Helens, USA Eruption 1980
Before and during (notice the side bulge)
(Since 1980 scientists have correctly predicted 19/22 eruptions..)Slide26
Mt.
St.Helens
May 1980
After the Eruption of May 1980
New lava dome beginning to formSlide27
Close-up view of the
solfatara
at
Ijen
, Indonesia with fumarole temperature of more than 220°C.
WARNING SIGNS…Slide28
WARNING SIGNS!!
(P.52)
1.Increase in minor extrusive activity-
Increase in
thermal activity
leads to a change in
fumarolic
activity- temp of hot springs and geysers become more frequent and vigorous.
There may also be an increase in the amount of
steam
issuing from an existing crater. Sometimes( e.g. with many Hawaiian volcanoes- a lava lake starts to develop inside the crater..)Slide29Slide30
2.
Increase in volcanic
gases:
e.g
Sulphur dioxide. It was due to this that a 24
hr
warning was given of the pending Mt Pinatubo eruption in the Philippines in 1991…
3.Increase in frequency and severity of previous eruptions:
allows evacuation
4. Increase in seismic activitySlide31
VOLCANO PREDICTION METHODSSlide32
Methods of Prediction:
( see diagram p.53-
add notes around it)
1 Remote sensing:
satellites with infra red detectors can monitor heat signals from volcanoes , suggesting that magma is rising towards the surface
( e.g.
Popacatapetal
eruption, Mexico was monitored in this way)
2.Seismicity: Frequently , minor earthquakes can indicate an oncoming volcano. ‘Harmonic tremors’ may occur- i.e. a narrow band of nearly continuous vibrations dominated by a single frequency ( e.g. prior to Mt.St. Helens erupted in USA 1982)3. Geophysical: Levelling surveys are undertaken ( e.g
Mt Vesuvius, Italy)
4. Hydrology:
Water often rises to the surface prior to an eruption5. Gas: Increase in gases prior to an eruption e.g. Sulphur dioxide6. Ground deformation: Tiltmeters
are used to measure ‘bulges’ which may occur as the ground
upswells
prior to an
eruption.e.g
. Mt St Helen’s bulge was naked to the human eyeSlide33
Have we met our lesson objectives?:
To know the
difference between predicting and forecasting hazard events What prediction methods are currently in place?
ON A CARD WRITE DOWN 3 MAIN POINTS THAT YOU HAVE LEARNT FROM TODAY’S LESSON