01
Summary of Part I — Alignment & Integration From launch and technical alignment to an actionable baseline for implementation 4 What has been discussed 1 Project frame goals, REA expectations, governance, finance and reporting 2 Sustainability frame LCA, eco-design 3 Technical interfaces&Risks WP3 → WP6 links, dependencies and integration points 4 Critical systems irradiation, cryogenic power electronics and demonstrator constraints 5 Key outcomes to carry forward Rq For communication: EU Visibility & Acknowledgement Requirements A Mandate for the EAB- proactive role with WPLs, beyond purely administrative oversight A Granularity for the LCA – fixed within the next six months O WP4 Magnet design : parameter database O WP3: More irradiation facilities? (I) Information-(Rc) Recommendation-(Rq) Requirement-(D) Decision-(A) Action-(O) Open point Shared
baseline Open issues
& risks Interface
WP connections LCA data
needs Year-1
actions Day-2
commitments Magn.Meas accuracy-to be assess Rq Test of individual coils in LN2 ? To be clarified A<br>
02
Implementation Day — Objectives & Expected Commitments Day 2 turns alignment into decisions, responsibilities and the first execution loop 5 Implementation logic Requirements Strategy Risks Synergies Commitments 1 Confirm demonstrator baselines Clarify context, requirements, interfaces, assumptions and what is needed for each demonstrator. 2 Define manufacturing & test strategy Agree how prototypes will move from design to manufacturing, testing, validation and reporting. 3 Prioritise Year-1 actions Convert risks, dependencies and roadmap items into a small number of owned actions with mitigations. 4 Activate synergies in communication Communication roadmap, connect communication, training, exploitation, EPITA/iRIS/TIARA links End point: final commitments, responsible persons, first deadlines and General Assembly readiness.<br>