PPT-Systems Intelligence Co-directors of the research group:
Author : yoshiko-marsland | Published Date : 2018-09-22
Profs Raimo P Hämäläinen and Esa Saarinen Aalto University Systems Analysis Laboratory httpsystemsintelligenceaaltofi Starting point Thinking about thinking We
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download
Presentation The PPT/PDF document
"Systems Intelligence Co-directors of th..." is the property of its rightful owner.
Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only,
and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all
copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of
this agreement.
Systems Intelligence Co-directors of the research group:: Transcript
Profs Raimo P Hämäläinen and Esa Saarinen Aalto University Systems Analysis Laboratory httpsystemsintelligenceaaltofi Starting point Thinking about thinking We always live and act as a part of a . . . . to Systems Intelligence. . . . Raimo . P. Hämäläinen. . . . systemsintelligence.aalto.fi. Disciplines . for . coping. with complexity. Systems Theory. Engineering, and . KINDI Laboratory for . Computing Research Joint Seminar . The seminar will present the results of an Artificial Intelligence Research Group. The Bioinformatics, Intelligent Systems and Educational Technology (BISITE) research group brings together a group of researchers interested primarily in the development and application of intelligent computer systems to various types of problems. BISITE is characterized by multi-disciplinary and inter-university. It is multidisciplinary by the member’s diverse profile: computer scientists, biologists, chemists, physicists, oceanographers and economists. The work of this group has a very practical component, although the theoretical aspects, necessary in any research, are not forgotten. Technological innovation also applies to the education and teaching fields, at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. . . . Brian Connett, LCDR, USN. US NAVAL ACADEMY. Cyber. “A failure by the Department to secure its systems in cyberspace would pose a fundamental . risk . to our ability to accomplish defense missions today and in the future.” . Objective: The student will illustrate three reasons why science based answers are more reliable than intuition or common sense. . Why do we conduct systematic, replicable, valid, and reliable research investigating human behavior and cognitive processing?. Intelligence. Morpheus. Project, OIH Otaniemi, 20.10.2016. Co. -directors. of the . SI . R. esearch. . G. roup. :. Profs. Raimo P. Hämäläinen and Esa Saarinen. Aalto University. Systems Analysis . What is Artificial Intelligence?. Blanket term that seems to change over time.. Often describes the Idea that a machine can learn and think.. A machine that can emulate or surpass human cognitive abilities.. Yasuo. SASAKI. Value Management Institute, Inc.. 27.9.2013. at Systems Analysis Lab.. 1. Who am I?. Tokyo Institute of Technology (PhD in 2013). s. ystems theory, decision theory, game theory.. TKK as a visiting researcher (Apr – Dec, 2009) . to . rscheearch. at . Cmabrigde. . Uinervtisy. , it . deosn't. . mttaer. in . waht. . oredr. the . ltteers. in a . wrod. are, the . olny. . iprmoatnt. . tihng. is . taht. the . frist. and . NATURAL INTELLIGENCE FOR MACHINESOur arti31cial intelligence systems are built on algorithms we abstract from the biological brainThe work is grounded in new research on how the biological brain manip Ambient Intelligence Definition. Ambient Intelligence (AmI) is the vision that technology will become invisible, embedded in our natural surroundings, present whenever we need it, enabled by simple and effortless interactions, attuned to all our senses.. Why/how do we measure it?. What do we do with the scores. ?. Link to . Human Intelligence Map. Major Issues. Theoretical vs. Psychometric base. One, two, or many factors. Nature vs. nurture. Individual or group administration. Session 1. Session Objectives. Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making. Understand the cultural divide between researchers and program/policy implementers. Understand the imp.