PPT-Evaluation of Music Teachers

Colleen Conway University of Michigan conwaycmumichedu Phillip Hash Calvin College pmh3calvinedu ACCESS PPT NOTES AT WWWPMHMUSICWEEBLYCOM Session Overview Voices of Michigan Music Educators. Fontana Unified School District. Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks. Associate Superintendent, . Oscar Dueñas. Director, Human Resources, Mark McLaughlin. Instructional Accountability. Local Educational Agency Plan / Single Plan for Student Achievement. PROCESS FOR TEACHER EVALUATION AND ACADEMIC . WORKLOAD. J. . Sanchez. 1,2. , . A. Badillo-. Milian. 3. , . H. . Chagolla. 3. , . A. . Mora. 1,. 3. , J. . Nieto-. Miranda. 4. 1. Tecnológico Nacional de México. Colleen Conway, University of Michigan. Phillip Hash, Calvin College. Wendee. Wolf-. Schlarf. , Traverse City Public Schools. Introduction. Goals for the Day/Preaching to the Choir. What is unique to Music Teacher Evaluation (MTE)?. Spring 2014 Update. Agenda. Evaluation Cycle Review. Goal Expectations and Rubric Review. SUMMATIVE Evaluation Requirements. FORMATIVE Evaluation Requirements. Preparing Artifacts. Rating Guidelines for Evaluators. l. Most . presentations on Apps at conferences are all about “Apple” apps, but I’m sure I’m not the only one to use Android devices. Following are some of the Android apps that I have found useful in my studio. Some of these are available on both platforms. I am certainly no expert at using technology, but have learnt through . T. eaching and Leading. Office of Evaluation. Division of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness. Summer 2017. Agenda . AchieveNJ: A Tool for Improving Teaching and Leading. Using Accurate Evaluations. to Inform Quality Professional Development. Work IN Progress. Purpose and Task of Project. Understand the framework of the new standards. Review the historical view of the standards work. Determine similarities and differences between current MISIC standards and the NEW standards (PE: 2013) (Art/Music: 2014) . T. eaching and Leading. Office of Evaluation. Division of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness. Summer 2017. Agenda . AchieveNJ: A Tool for Improving Teaching and Leading. Using Accurate Evaluations. to Inform Quality Professional Development. Strategies for Assessing Student Growth in the Ensemble Setting . Introduction. Phillip Hash, Calvin College. Session Overview. 1. Legislative . Review: Talking Points. All. Teachers Evaluated Annually. Sabra Gage, WTEA President. MSDWT . Teacher Evaluation Information. Review of Updates. 2014-2015. Overview of Updates. Replaced . OwnIt. ! Teacher Evaluation Software with Standard for Success. Revised Domain II Rubric. to 1900. Class 2. Assignment for Monday. Giddings, T. P. (1919). . Grade School Music Teaching:. . for superintendents, music. . supervisors, and grade teachers. . New York: C. H. Congdon. Chapters 1, 3-5 (pp. 1-8, 24-71). . 3IntroductionThe question of practising has been a perennial topic of discussion between instrumental music teachers and their students Yet despite the growing body of evidence on e31ective practising Teaching Comfortably While Remaining Highly Organized. . Presented Virtually. February 20, 2021. For the . Kodály. Educators of Southern New England. Robbin L. Marcus. www.robbinlmarcus.com.  . This list was generated by music teachers in Robbin Marcus’ . 2 types of PML uses. Large groups (Bands. Choirs, orchestras). Solos and/or ensembles. Why have a prescribed list?. A prescribed music list can exemplify the philosophical foundations of music. Not only do the lists express educational and musical goals, but social and aesthetic values derived from the performance of the music in contests—the development of attributes that are important to perpetuate music in our society.