/
Total time to end of restriction Total time to end of restriction

Total time to end of restriction - PowerPoint Presentation

liane-varnes
liane-varnes . @liane-varnes
Follow
381 views
Uploaded On 2015-11-25

Total time to end of restriction - PPT Presentation

Method People admitted to the Emergency Room of Instituto Philippe Pinel Rio de Janeiro Brazil whose aggressionagitation was thought due to psychosis and for whom staff were unsure if best to restrict using physical restraints or a seclusion room were randomly allocated to one or the ID: 204605

janeiro seclusion rio people seclusion janeiro people rio restraints health room due aggression university time care randomised trials mental

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Total time to end of restriction" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Total time to end of restriction

Method

People admitted to the Emergency Room of Instituto Philippe Pinel, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, whose aggression/agitation was thought due to psychosis and for whom staff were unsure if best to restrict using physical restraints or a seclusion room, were randomly allocated to one or the other and followed up to 14 days (primary outcome - ‘No need to early change allocated treatment – within 1 hour’ and ‘Not restricted - by 4 hours’).

Findings105 people were randomised. Two thirds of people secluded were able to be fully managed in this way. Many more trials need to be undertaken in this under-researched area

Background After de-escalation techniques have failed, restraints, seclusion and/or rapid tranquillisation may be used for people whose aggression is due to psychosis. Most coercive acts of heath care have not been evaluated in trials.Lack of fair testing leaves mental health services unnecessarily open to criticism

Reference:

Psychol Med. 2012 Nov;42(11):2265-73. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712000372.Correspondence: Clive.adams@nottingham.ac.uk

ConclusionEven taking into account the move out of seclusion into restraints this study provides evidence that embarking on the less restrictive care pathway (seclusion) does not increase overall time in restriction of some sort (RR Not restricted - by 4 hours 1.09 CI 0.75-1.58; mean time to release: restraints 337.6 minutes (SD 298.2), seclusion room 316.3 minutes (SD 264.5), p=0.48). Participants tended to be more satisfied with their care in the seclusion group (17.0% vs 11.1%) but this did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance (p=0.42).

Physical restraints versus seclusion room for management of people with acute aggression or agitation due to psychotic illness (TREC-SAVE): a randomised trial (ISRCTN 49454276)

Gisele Huf

1,2 Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho3 Clive E Adams4 TREC-SAVE Collaborative Group1. National Institute of Quality Control in Health – Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil2. University Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho – Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil3. National School of Public Health - Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil4. Division of Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK

CONSORT