/
Audience reactions to media personae Audience reactions to media personae

Audience reactions to media personae - PowerPoint Presentation

olivia-moreira
olivia-moreira . @olivia-moreira
Follow
431 views
Uploaded On 2015-09-29

Audience reactions to media personae - PPT Presentation

Audience members can react in many ways to media personae The reactionperspective will depend on a variety of factors A few significant questions include Does the audience member treat the ID: 144473

percent character identification audience character percent audience identification member boys role characters girls children media cohen american heroes chose persona asian models

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Audience reactions to media personae" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Audience reactions to media personaeSlide2

Audience members can react in many ways to media personae

The reaction/perspective will depend on a variety of factors. A few significant questions include

:

Does

the audience member treat the

character

as

at least somewhat realistic?

Does the audience member ‘suspend disbelief in relation to the portrayed environment? To the character? To the actor/anchor/etc

.?

What impression does the audience member have of the character’s personality?

Is

the viewer/audience member drawn to the character in some

way?

As a role model?

As a friend?

Slide3

Does the audience member treat the personae as realistic in some way?

This does not require that the audience member perceive the persona to exist as a real person when the show ends. The persona must be capable of acting as an appropriate character within the constraints of the program-world and the program-world must be accepted in the sense of suspension of disbelief.

RobotSlide4

What impression does the audience member have of the character’s personality?

Viewer/listeners/audience members evaluate the morality of characters, etc. through their words and deeds and, sometimes, their thoughts as revealed by the author/director, etc.

AttributionSlide5

Audience members tend to affiliate with those they admire, but there are exceptions

Large numbers of viewers liked J.R. Ewing the best among characters on Dallas

Viewer evaluations vary along a wide

contiuum

, from adoration (fan clubs) to disgust (

chearing

at the dismemberment of villains, etc.)Slide6

What position does the audience member take in relation to the text and/or the character?

Does the audience member maintain the position of external spectator, aware of the fictitious nature of the presentation?

Does the audience member take a perspective from inside the portrayed world?

Character within the story

Internal spectator

Does the audience come to inhabit the body of a character, “living within” the on-screen (or in-story, or on-radio) persona?Slide7

Does the viewer/audience member react to the character in some

way

?

The evidence seems to indicate that an audience member may be attracted to, repulsed by, terrified of, or in some other

emotional

way, affected by the persona portrayed.Slide8

What is ‘identification’?

Identification is where the audience member takes on the role of the

persona/character

“vicarious experience” of things that we could not otherwise have any access to

[

Cohen, 2002]

Audience members may ‘try on’ others’ identities, etc.

Seen as both natural and troubling in teenagers

Thought to be especially common in online role-playingSlide9

Identification and fictional involvement

Identifying with a character:

“provides a point of view on the plot”

“leads to an understanding of character motives”

brings about “an investment in the outcome of events”

generates “a sense of intimacy and emotional connection with a character”

[Source: Cohen, 2006]Slide10

“Identification is fleeting and varies in intensity (Wilson, 1993), a sensation felt intermittently during exposure to a media message. While identifying with a character, an audience member imagines him- or herself being that character and replaces his or her personal identity and role as audience member with the identity and role of the character within the text. While strongly identifying, the audience member ceases to be aware of his or her social role as an audience member and temporarily (but usually repeatedly) adopts the perspective of the character with whom he or she identifies.”

Cohen, 2006Slide11

Wishful identification

A second form of identification is more lasting. Audience members have stated that they wish to be like a character/persona. That is, they would like to emulate one or more qualities exhibited by the character.Slide12

An important basis for identification is when the audience member understands and then adopts the goals of a character. The audience member then reacts to the attempt to reach those goals within the environment of the story, etc.

Cohen, 2006Slide13

“Directors

and writers create characters with whom audiences are meant to interact

. . . .

Unlike identification with parents, leaders, or nations, identification with media characters is a result of a carefully constructed situation.

. . .

it is important to note that identification is a response to communication by others that is marked by internalizing a point of view rather than a process of projecting one’s own identity onto someone or something else

.”Slide14

What leads to identification?

Production features that lead the audience member to adopt the character’s perspective

An audience member’s fondness for a character

A realization of similarity of the character to oneself on the part of the audience member

“These

lead to a

psychological merging (

Oatley

, 1999) or attachment,

in which the audience member

comes to internalize the characters’ goals within the narrative

.”

CohenSlide15

“The

audience member then empathizes with the character and adopts the character’s identity. As the narrative progresses, the audience member simulates the feelings and thoughts appropriate for the events that occur

.”

CohenSlide16

Four dimensions of identification

The first is empathy or sharing the feelings of the character (i.e., being happy; sad; or scared, not for the character, but with the character).

The second is a cognitive aspect that is manifest in sharing the perspective of the character. Operationally this can be measured by the degree to which an audience member feels he or she understands the character and the motivations for his or her behavior.

The third indicator of identification is motivational, and this addresses the degree to which the audience member internalizes and shares the goals of the character.

Finally, the fourth component of identification is absorption or the degree to which self-awareness is lost during exposure to the text.

[Cohen, 2002]Slide17

Encouraging identification

“Writing, acting, and directing must be of sufficient quality”

“partly achieved by offering an illusion of reality”

‘relevance’ and ‘resonance’ of issues and eventsSlide18

“Identification

may be ended or interrupted when the audience member is made aware of him- or herself through an external stimuli (e.g., the phone rings), a textual stimuli (e.g., a change of camera angle or a direct reference to the reader), or the end of the story

.”

CohenSlide19

I

dentification may lead to increased

liking

for or

imitation

of a character—especially a positive character.

Identifying

with

characters

who are evil or very violent may evoke some understanding or even sympathy for them during reading or viewing but strongly identifying with such a character is likely to cause dissonance, guilt, or even fear.Slide20

Identification

Parasocial interaction

Liking, similarity, affinity

Imitation

Nature of process

Emotional and cognitive, alters state of awareness

Interactional

Attitude

Behavior

Basis

Understanding and empathy

Attraction

Perception of character and self

Modeling

Positioning of viewer

As character

As self

As self

As learner (self as other)

Associated phenomena

Absorption in text, emotional release

Attachment to character and text, keeping company

Fandom, realism

Learning, reinforcement

Positioning of viewer

As character

As self

As self

As learner (self as other)Slide21

Influence of medium

Literature—invites identification with hero/protagonist and, to a lesser extent, narrator

Film—encourages spectator role, but may foster identification with protagonist or

camera—“narrator

Television—may be too

uninvolving to lead to identification at all

Domestic, chaotic viewing situationSlide22

Antecedents to identification

Similarity and homophily

Children:

Identify with role models—who they would like to be more than who they are like

Especially children over 8

Attitude homophily positively related to identification

Identified with child characters (similar to themselves)

Exception: girls often identified with male characters

Identified with animals

Teens

Often chose opposite-sex characters based on romantic or sexual attraction

Favored young adult rather than teen charactersSlide23

Working-class women identified with upper class women on Dynasty more than did middle class women

1/5 of German men chose female favorite TV person compared to 1/3 German women choosing male

Aggressive children

reported

higher

homophily

and identification with aggressive charactersSlide24

“it seems that whereas similarity in attitudes predicts character choice, simple demographic similarity is not a good predictor. People often identify with characters that represent what they wish to be or to whom they are attracted, rather than what they are. It also seems that psychological similarity is more important than demographic similarity in shaping identification.”

[Source: Cohen, 2006]Slide25

Traits of characters that encourage identification

Men: Boys and girls like them for their intelligence, girls like them for sense of humor

Women: Boys and girls judged them based on their looks

Heroes identified with more often than villains

Exception: many preferred J.R. Ewing

In general, strength, humor and physical attractiveness are preferred

Much like in real life

In general, much left to be determined in why people are attracted to charactersSlide26

Viewer characteristics

Findings on gender ambiguous

Women higher in parasocial interaction

Findings concerning age are ambiguous

Young, teens and older adults appear to have stronger parasocial relationships

Does not appear to be related to poor interpersonal relations

Some indication that “those anxiously attached individuals who desire strong relationships but have trouble developing secure and stable relationships” have the strongest parasocial relationships

[source: Cohen, 2006]Slide27

Identification effects

Increase enjoyment of fiction

Persuasion

Memorability

Modeling and imitation

Learning

Reduced critical stanceSlide28

“In sum, identification is an active psychological state, but neither stable nor exclusive. It is one of many ways we respond to characters, and one of many positions from which we experience entertainment. The development and strength of identification depend on multiple factors: the nature of the character, the viewer, and the text (directing, writing, and acting). Finally, identification is part of a a larger set of responses to entertainment, ways in which we become engrossed and delighted by the fortunes and misfortunes of others.”

[Source: Cohen, 2006]Slide29

Parasocial interaction

Horton and

Wohl

used the term in

1956Slide30

Parasocial interaction

Developing a relationship with a media persona that exhibits some of the characteristics of interpersonal relationships

Liking, dislike

Talking to the character/yelling at the character

Feeling as though the character is addressing her individually

Seeing the persona as a ‘friend’

Caring about the persona

Missing the persona when skipping an episode, etc.Slide31

Superhero play

One researcher observed children's superhero play in a school setting and found that boys created more superhero stories than girls did, and that girls often were excluded from such play. When girls were included they were given stereotypical parts, such as helpers or victims waiting to be saved. Even powerful female X-Men characters were made powerless in the boys' adaptations

(Dyson, 1994). Slide32

In

one retrospective study (French & Pena, 1991), adults between the ages of 17 and 83 provided information about their favorite childhood play themes, their heroes, and the qualities of those heroes.

. . . While

media was the main source of heroes for kids who grew up with television, the previous generations found their heroes not only from the media, but also from direct experience, friends / siblings, and parents' occupations (French & Pena, 1991

).Slide33

Children’s heros

179 children,

ages 8 to 13, were surveyed from five day camp sites in central and southern California.

. . . 24

African Americans, 31 Asian Americans, 74 Latinos, 1 Middle Eastern American, 2 Native Americans, 45 whites, and 2 "other." Ninety-five girls and 84 boys participated. Slide34

"We would like to know whom you look up to and admire. These might be people you know, or they might be famous people or characters. You may want to be like them or you might just think they are cool." More respondents described a person they knew (65 percent) rather than a person they did not know, such as a person or character in the media (35 percent). Slide35

Similar to the overall sample, 70 percent of the African American and 64 percent of the White children chose people they knew as heroes. In contrast, only 35 percent of the Asian American kids and 49 percent of the Latino kids named people they knew.Slide36

While both girls and boys named people they knew as their heroes, 67 percent of the girls did so as compared with only 58 percent of the boys.Slide37

One feature of role modeling is that children tend to choose role models whom they find relevant and with whom they can compare themselves (Lockwood &

Kunda

, 2000). Children who do not "see themselves" in the media may have fewer opportunities to select realistic role models.Slide38

African American and white children were more likely to have media heroes of their same ethnicity (67 percent for each). In contrast, Asian American and Latino children chose more white media heroes than other categories (40 percent and 56 percent, respectively). Only 35 percent of the Asian Americans respondents, and 28 percent of the Latino respondents, chose media heroes of their own ethnicity.Slide39

Overall

, children in this study more often chose a same-gender person as someone they look up to and admire. This pattern is consistent across all four ethnic groups, and stronger for boys than girls. Only 6 percent of the boys chose a girl or woman, while 24 percent of the girls named a boy or man. Slide40

while

boys tend to emulate same-gender models more than girls do, boys may emulate a woman if she is high in social power. Therefore, boys may be especially likely to have boys and men as role models because they are more likely to be portrayed in positions of power. Slide41

It also has been noted that college-age women select men and women role models with the same frequency, whereas college-age men still tend to avoid women role models.

. . . (

Gibson & Cordova, 1999).Slide42

Overall, children most frequently (34 percent) named their parents as role models and heroes. The next highest category (20 percent) was entertainers; in descending order, the other categories were friends (14 percent), professional athletes (11 percent), and acquaintances (8 percent). Authors and historical figures were each chosen by only 1 percent of the children.Slide43

African

American and white children chose a parent most frequently (30 percent and 33 percent, respectively). In contrast, Asian Americans and Latinos chose entertainers (musicians, actors, and television personalities) most frequently (39 percent for Asian Americans and 47 percent for Latinos), with parents coming in second

place.Slide44

Asian

American and Latina girls most frequently picked entertainers (50 percent of the Asian American girls and 41 percent of the Latinas), while African American and white girls chose parents (33 percent and 29 percent, respectively). Asian American boys most frequently named a professional athlete (36 percent), African American boys most frequently picked a parent (30 percent), Latino boys most frequently chose entertainers (54 percent), and white boys picked parents (38 percent).Slide45

When asked why they admired their heroes and role models, the children most commonly replied that the person was nice, helpful, and understanding (38 percent). Parents were appreciated for their generosity, their understanding, and for "being there

."Slide46

Parents were also praised for the lessons they teach their kids. A 9-- year-old Asian American boy told us, "I like my dad because he is always nice and he teaches me."Slide47

The second most admired feature of kids' role models was skill (27 percent). The skills of athletes and entertainers were most often mentioned. Slide48

The third most frequently mentioned characteristic was a sense of humor (9 percent), which was most often attributed to entertainers. For instance, a 10-year-old Latino boy picked Will Smith "because he's funny. He makes jokes and he dances funny."Slide49

Bibliography

Cohen, J. (2006). Audience identification with media characters. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.),

Psychology of entertainment

(pp. 183-197). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance.

Psychiatry, 19

, 215-229.

Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T., & Schramm, H. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.),

Psychology of entertainment

(pp. 291-313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.