/
CMOS Hybrid pixel detectors CMOS Hybrid pixel detectors

CMOS Hybrid pixel detectors - PowerPoint Presentation

sportyinds
sportyinds . @sportyinds
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2020-07-04

CMOS Hybrid pixel detectors - PPT Presentation

Richard Bates amp Dima Maneuski Contents Motivation for hybrid CMOS Assembly 100316 R Bates 2 CMOS designs Depleted Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor HRmaterial charge collection by drift ID: 795315

bates cmos sensor roic cmos bates roic sensor glue tsv bond power chip bonding copper connection wafer thickness digital

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "CMOS Hybrid pixel detectors" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

CMOS Hybrid pixel detectors

Richard Bates &

Dima

Maneuski

Slide2

Contents

Motivation for hybrid CMOS

Assembly

10/03/16

R. Bates

2

Slide3

CMOS designs

Depleted Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor

HR-material (charge collection by drift)

Fully depleted MAPS (DMAPS)

Hybrid Pixels with Smart Diodes

HR or HV-CMOS as a sensor (8”)Standard FE chip

CCPD (HVCMOS) on FE-I4

CMOS Active Sensors + Digital R/O chip

HR or HV-CMOS sensor + CSA (+Discriminator)Dedicated “digital only” FE chipPassive CMOS Sensor + R/O chipHR or HV-CMOS sensorDedicated FE chipLow cost C4 bumping and flip-chip

10/03/16

R. Bates

3

Diode + Analogue + Digital

Diode + Analogue

Diode + Analogue

Diode

Standard FE (A + D)

Digital FE

Standard FE (A + D)

Tomasz

Hemperek

, ACES, 8

th

to 10

th

March 2016

Slide4

Hybrid CMOS Motivation over planar

Reduced

material

CMOS

active area is thinSensor Cost

CMOS sensors cheap compared to 6-inch FZ planarFlip-chip cost

Capacitive

coupling reduces complexity of interconnect

Lower Analogue powerCapacitive load of pixel reducedLess cooling requirementsPost-irradiation operation at higher temperatures

10/03/16

R. Bates

4

Slide5

Why not Monolithic?

Separation of analogue from digital

circuitry

Better

analogue performanceBuild flexibilitySmaller sensor pixels that ROIC

pixelsUse signal size to encode positionLarge area CMOS with small ROIC footprint

T

he strip sensor shown before but with smaller pixels

Electronics flexibilityFull ROIC CMOS in smallest nodeMaximum functionality of digital sideHigher fill factor and more uniform response10/03/16

R. Bates

5

Slide6

Process options

Electronics inside charge collection

well

Collection node with large fill factor -> rad. hard

Large sensor capacitance (DNW/PW junction) -> X-talk, noise & speed (power) penalties

Full CMOS with isolation between NW and DNW

Electronics outside collection well

Very small sensor capacitance -> lowest power

Potentially less rad. hard

longer drift lengthsFull CMOS with additional DPW

10/03/16

R. Bates

6

Larger capacitance makes it more difficult for the readout

Slide7

AssemblySimply glue the two together

Control the glue thickness

Direct bonding

Wafer-to-wafer copper-to-copper bond

The DC connection for power

10/03/16

R. Bates

7

Slide8

Glue CMOS sensor to ROIC

Simple glue layer between ROIC and CMOS sensor

Use a flip-chip machine to align and flip-chip the die

Output of the CMOS is

capacitively coupled to the ROIC

No expensive bump bondsStill needs die to die flip-chipControl can be

capacitively

coupled

Still require DC power connections10/03/16R. Bates

8

N.

Alipour Tehrani, VCI 15th

to 19th Feb 2016, Vienna, CLICdp collaboration

Slide9

CMOS for CLICpix

10/03/16

R. Bates

9

CCPDv3

Deep n-well collects charge

Shields electronics from substrate -> prevents charge loss to electronics well

180nm HV-CMOS process

Two-stage amplifier in each pixel -> Tpeak = 120 ns

Slide10

Results – Cap coupled CLICpix

Test-beam at CERN SPS (EUDET/AIDA telescope)

High Detection efficiency (even without Sensor bias)

Non-uniformity of glue thickness visible in variation of the measured mean charge (

ToT

) across the matrix~ 6 μm single-point resolution

Demonstrated

AC

coupled HV-CMOS smart sensorCLICpix2 readout and CMOS sensors under development10/03/16

R. Bates

10

Slide11

SU8 pillars to control glue thickness

Better control of glue thickness over large area device

Single chip assemblies

Glue

and SU8

spacer

Pillar height ~ 5

μm

Device thickness Stdev = 0.6 μm 10/03/16

R. Bates

11

A.

Gaudiello

, Trento Workshop, 22

nd to 24

th Feb 2016, INFN

Slide12

Wafer-to-wafer bond

Preferred solution for back-illuminated visual CMOS in the modern world

10/03/16

R. Bates

12

ST Microelectronics & CEA LETI

- - - - bond line between CMOS sensor and ROIC

Sony http

://

www.sony.net

/

SonyInfo

/News/Press.201201/12-009E

ST

L.

Benaissa

et al., “Next Generation Image Sensor via Direct Hybrid Bonding

”, EPTC proceeding,

2015

Slide13

Direct copper to copper bonding

Wafer

level process

Room temperature process

Moderate post bond anneal (200-400C)Process

Copper deposition and oxide growthCopper for metallic conductive bondsNo glue or solder required

Chemical mechanical polish of surfaces

Surface roughness RMS ~ 0.5 nm

Wet clean / Plasma cleanIon beam surface activationWafer alignmentx/y better than 400 nmContact wafer and bond formsAnneal to recrystallize copper over bondIncrease bond strength – removes bond interface

Treat bonded device as single waferThin CMOS to 10 μm thickness

Add TSV last as required

10/03/16

R. Bates

13

Slide14

Copper direct bonding

10/03/16

R. Bates

14

SAM image – improving wafer bond quality: white – void/ black -bond

R.

Taïbi

et al., “Full characterization of Cu/Cu direct bonding for 3D integration”,

EPTC

proceeding, 2010, pp. 219-225

Cu-Cu bond.

Cu crystal growth removing bonding interface

Slide15

8-inch FZ with pixel ROICs direct bonded

10/03/16

R. Bates

15

VIPIC

VIP2B

VICTR

Bonded with

Ziptronix

Ni-DBI (Oxide-Oxide Fusion bonding)

Ray

Yarema

, CMOS workshop, Sept 15

th

to 17

th

2014, Bonn, FNAL

Slide16

VIPIC

10/03/16

R. Bates

16

VIPIC

is

34

μm thick and has

bonding pads on its back to connect to PCB

Slide17

The DC power connection

Power via the back of the CMOS/ROIC

Through Silicon Via, TSV

TSV last for ROIC – Aspect ratio of 3:1

Via middle possible for CMOS – 2

μm vias possible

10/03/16

R. Bates

17

CMOS

ROIC

PCB

TSV last by CEA LETI

RDL by CEA LETI

RDL

TSV

Electrical DC connection between die. TSV on one side

Slide18

The DC power connection

10/03/16

R. Bates

18

CMOS

ROIC

PCB

TSV last by CEA LETI

RDL by CEA LETI

RDL

TSV

AC connection between die. TSV on one side, wire bond the other

Wirebond

Power via the back of the CMOS/ROIC

Through Silicon Via, TSV

TSV last for ROIC – Aspect ratio of 3:1

Via middle possible for CMOS – 2

μm

vias

possible

Slide19

The DC power connectionPower from the front of the CMOS/ROIC

Traces

on one chip powers both

chips

Conductive glue used for DC connection for power only

10/03/16

R. Bates

19

PCB

CMOS

ROIC

AC connections via glue

Trace on chip

DC connection via glue dot