/
MEGAPROJECT  Case Study MEGAPROJECT  Case Study

MEGAPROJECT Case Study - PowerPoint Presentation

stefany-barnette
stefany-barnette . @stefany-barnette
Follow
386 views
Uploaded On 2017-05-20

MEGAPROJECT Case Study - PPT Presentation

Case compiled by Agnieszka Łukasiewicz Contact details alukasibdimedupl tel 48 664 786 880 MEGAPROJECT Case Study Basic Project Information Case compiled by Agnieszka Łukasiewicz ID: 550384

environment project stakeholder management project environment management stakeholder section megaproject information stakeholders external present protection processespresent describe initiation relationship

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "MEGAPROJECT Case Study" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

MEGAPROJECT Case Study

Case compiled by:

Agnieszka

Łukasiewicz

Contact details:

alukas@ibdim.edu.pl , tel. +48 664 786 880Slide2

MEGAPROJECT Case Study

Basic Project Information

Case compiled by: Agnieszka Łukasiewicz

Contact details:

alukas@ibdim.edu.pl

Project TitleMotorway

A2LocationGerman/Polish

border

– Nowy Tomyśl

Purpose

connects Poland with the network of European motorways

Scope

Part

of A2 motorway from Polish/German border to one of main Polish cities – PoznańPart of Route E30 (Cork/IE – Omsk/Ru)Part of TEN-T 2nd corridorTotal Project Value1,300 mln €Project Status(i.e.. initiation, planning, construction, operation, dismantling)OperationContractual Framework (e.g. fixed price, cost-plus etc.)Fixed priceRelevant Physical Dimensions (e.g. height, width, volume, length)104.9 km, 6 interchanges, 35 passages for big and medium animals, 71 passages for small animals, protective barriers for bats etc.

SECTION 1 - BASIC PROJECT INFORMATIONSlide3

Stakeholder Category

Case-Study

Comments

(e.g. maturity, previous experiences of stakeholders, skills, influence on project)

Internal

Supply-Side

Client

Autostrada Wielkopolska II SA

concessionaire

,

side

of PPP

agreement

FinanciersSubordinated Investment (388 mln €)Commercial Loans (186 mln € BBVA S.A., Bank Pekao S.A., BRE Bank S.A., Caja Madrid, Calyon, Deutsche Bank AG, Espirito Santo Investment, KfW IPEX-Bank GmbH, PKO BP, Societe Generale, WestLB)European Investment Bank (958 mln €)

Sponsors

Minister of InfrastructureClient’s CustomersClient’s Owners1. Kulczyk Holding S.A2. Meridiam A2 West S a.r.l.3. Strabag AG4. KWM Investment GmbHOther internal supply-side categories ( please specify)CategoryCase-Study General Directorate for National Roads and MotorwaysCentral road administration authority for issues related to the national road system

MEGAPROJECT Internal Stakeholder Identification(Stakeholders with a direct legally sanctioned relationship with the project)

SECTION 2 - PROJECT STAKEHOLDERSSlide4

Demand Side)

Principal Contractor

A2strada sp. z o.o.

Company

owned

by Kulczyk Holding SA and Strabag AG

First Tier Contractors

Scott

Wilson

Engineer

Second Tier Consultants

AECOM

Traffic and Revenue StudyProfessional Services Providers

Autostrada Eksploatacja

SAan operating company acting subject to an agreement with the Concessionaire, Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A.Other internal supply-side categories ( please specify)CategoryCase-StudySECTION 2 - PROJECT STAKEHOLDERSMEGAPROJECT Internal Stakeholder Identification(Stakeholders with a direct legally sanctioned relationship with the project)Slide5

Stakeholder Category

Case-Study

Comments

(e.g. maturity, previous experiences of stakeholders, skills, influence on project)

External

Public

Regulatory Agencies

General Directorate for National Roads and Motorways

Local Government

Wielkopolska

County,

Lubuskie

County

National Government

Minister of

InfrastrucutureMinister of the EnvironmentOther internal supply-side categories ( please specify)CategoryCase-studyPrivateLocal residentsLocal LandownersPrivate landownersEnvironmentalistsPracownia na rzecz wszystkich istotNGO monitored all aspects of planning new route, especially influence on Natura 2000 areas and animal migration patternsConservationistsArchaeologists

Adama Mickiewicza University in Poznan

Other External Private stakeholders (please specify)

Category

Casestudy

Drivers and passengers in general

MEGAPROJECT External Stakeholder Identification

SECTION 2 - PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS

(Stakeholders with a direct interest in the project but with no legal contract)Slide6

SECTION 2 -PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS

MEGAPROJECT Stakeholder Relationship Maps

Name of Actor

Description of

relationship

Repeat this map for as many project phases as you require

Key:

- Project Actor

- Project relationship

with a contractual basis

- Non-contractual project

relationship

Description of relationshipSlide7

SECTION 2 - PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS

MEGAPROJECT External Stakeholder Attitude Analysis

External Stakeholder

External Stakeholder’s Attitude

to this Project

External Stakeholder’s Influence on projectImpact

of Project on External StakeholderPhase of Project of Greatest Interest(

initiation, planning, construction,

operation, dismantling)

Ministry

of

Infrastructure

Favourable – although sometimes depended of governing partyVery highNegotiations: Price of buiding 1km (9.6 m. €),Rates for users,Other conditions Initiation, operatingGeneral Directorate for National Roads and MotorwaysFavourable – mostly depended on government’s decisionsHighControling role of road administrationAllMinistry of Environment

Concerning

about effects on environment, especialy Natura 2000 areasVery highHigh requirtements of environment protection (1/4 of the whole value of the project was allocated on environment protection)Initiation, planningEuropean CommisionFavourableHighNotification of Natura 2000 project’s influenceInitiation, planningUEFAVery FavourableVery highDecision about Euro 2012 in Poland and Ukraine. Acceleration of decision making process about the project.InitiationSlide8

SECTION 2 - PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS

MEGAPROJECT External Stakeholder Attitude Analysis

External Stakeholder

External Stakeholder’s Attitude

to this Project

External Stakeholder’s Influence on projectImpact

of Project on External StakeholderPhase of Project of Greatest Interest(

initiation, planning, construction,

operation, dismantling)

Local

goverments

Favourable

LimitedImproving local flow of trafficInitiation, planningPracownia na rzecz wszystkich istotWorried about environmentHighMonitoring all aspects of influence the project on environmentInitiation, planning, constructionSlide9

MEGAPROJECT Project Management

Project

Organisation

-

Needed an interview with the

project managerClient Project Team Size

& StructureContractor Project Team Size and Structure

Sub-Contractor Project Team Involvement

Project Tools and

Techniques

-

Needed

an interview with the project managerPlease √ if present, x if absent , leave blank if unknownLife-Cycle Costing Approaches □Stakeholder Involvement □Building Information Modelling (BIM) □Project Management Software □Relationship Management Tools □Project Knowledge Management Tools □Lessons Learnt Transfers □Team Building Tools □Competency framework □Other Tools and Techniques or More InformationSECTION 3 - PROJECT MANAGEMENTSlide10

Risk Management ProcessesPresent (

describe below) □

Not Present □ No Information

HR Management ProcessesPresent

(describe below) □Not Present □ No Information

□Procurement Management Processes

Present

(

describe below

)

Not Present

□ No Information □Integration Management ProcessesPresent (describe below) □Not Present □ No Information □Scope Management ProcessesPresent (describe below) □Not Present □ No Information □Time Management ProcessesPresent (describe below) □Not Present □ No Information □Cost Management ProcessesPresent (describe below) □Not Present □ No Information

Quality management ProcessesPresent (describe below) □Not Present □ No Information □Communications Management ProcessesPresent (describe below) □Not Present □ No Information □Project Processes - Needed an interview with the project managerSECTION 3 - PROJECT MANAGEMENTSlide11

MEGAPROJECT Project Performance

Aspects of Performance Concerned with Doing the Project Right

Original Targets and changes to targets

Actual

Achievements Against Targets

Performance relating to time

The first plan was 2006 for finalising the project

.

Legal

changes

and

long lasting negotiations caused 5 yrs delay.After starting the construction process it lasted 6 months less than it was planned.Performance relating to cost6.1 m. per building 1 km9.6 m. per building 1 kmPerformance related to achieving specificationThere wasn’t an issue of Natura 2000 areas. Need to change the whole

enviromnmental protection specification. All targets concerning natural environment protection were achieved, 25% of the project’s value was spent on environment protection.SECTION 4 - PROJECT PERFORMANCESlide12

Aspects of Performance Concerned with Doing the Right Project

Stakeholder or Stakeholder Grouping

Original Aims of Project Involvement and Changes to these AimsAchievement of these Aims

EC, Pracownia na rzecz wszystkich istot (

extremely important environmental

issues)There

wasn’t an issue of Natura 2000

areas

.

Need

to

change

the

whole enviromnmental protection specification. All targets concerning natural environment protection were achieved, 25% of the project’s value was spent on environment protection.SECTION 4 - PROJECT PERFORMANCESlide13

MEGAPROJECT Project Environment

Legal and Regulatory Environment

Legal and Regulatory

Project Environment (regionally, nationally and Europe wide)

National

(build law)Euroepan (environment protection

law)Specific Legal and Regulatory events impacting on the project

Zmiana przepisów ochrony środowiska

Nowe wymogi banków finansujących projekt w zakresie ochrony środowiska podczas budowy i eksploatacji

Obowiązek sporządzenia Audytu Bezpieczeństwa

Zmiana obszarów chronionych w czasie realizacji projektu (powołanie nowych i poszerzenie ustalonych)

Obowiązek sporządzania Raportów do Projektu Budowlanego

(wymóg Komisji Europejskiej oraz banków finansujących projekt)

SECTION 5 - PROJECT ENVIRONMENTSlide14

MEGAPROJECT Project Environment

Political Environment

Political

Project Environment

Hostile

attitude to the concession

agreement one of governing partySpecific Political Events impacting on the project

ElectionsSlide15

MEGAPROJECT Project Environment

Economic Environment

Economic Project

Environment

Price

of building materials increaseSpecific Economic Events impacting on the project

SECTION 5 - PROJECT ENVIRONMENTSlide16

Events and activities relating to project stakeholders

Events and activities relating to project management

Events and activities relating to project performance

Events and activities relating to project environment

MEGAPROJECT Project Key Events and Activities Timeline

TIME

SECTION 6 - PROJECT

TIMELINE

1993 1995 2000 2004 2009 2011 2012

Establishing

comapny

winning

concessioning cometition (2 fragments of A2 highway)Negotiations about first fragment of A2 highwayRealisation of first fragment of A2 highwayNegotiations about second fragment of A2 highwayRealisation of second fragment of A2 highwayInfrastuktura uzupełniająca rozpoczęcie poboru opłat